• Hill Heat
  • Posts
  • "This is wholesale destruction, what’s proposed"

"This is wholesale destruction, what’s proposed"

The question is not whether to fund or shut down the government—it’s whether to fund or shut down this government

PRESENTED BY EGRETS: I’VE HAD A FEW

Giving a blank check to the Trump regime is a bad idea. But today is a great day to become a paid subscriber to Hill Heat:

Egret taking flight.

As Billy Joe Armstrong said, it’s time to wake up. Federal shutdowns during a gap in appropriations are a legacy of the Reagan era, and we’re about to hit another one at midnight. Funding bills remain subject to a Senate filibuster, for now, so the Trump regime needs the support of at least seven Democrats to continue its openly fascist reign with a whiff of Constitutional legitimacy. Andy Craig clearly defines what’s at stake today:

“The question is not whether to fund or shut down the government—it’s whether to fund or shut down this government. There is no abstract, apolitical entity called ‘the government’ that exists separate from the regime currently in charge. Today, it is Trump’s government, dominated and subordinated to his erratic dictates. To blindly fund that machine is to underwrite the very apparatus now being weaponized against American democracy.”

This is the government that is banning the words “climate change,” “green,” and “emissions,” propping up the coal industry, using American cities as “training grounds for our military,” and defining any organization to the left of Charlie Kirk as “anti-American” “terrorism.”

Faced with this civilizational threat, Congressional Democrats are coordinated in holding the line for their support on health care costs. In particular, they’re seeking to extend Obamacare tax credits for the healthcare industry to keep health insurance affordable for 15 million Americans, championed by progressive healthcare blogger Charles Gaba, the healthcare industry (and their front-group think tanks), and Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.). By early September, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), and MoveOn set the line for voting for a government funding bill at “saving the ACA.”

A Great Egret looking for lunch in shallow water. #BirdOfTheDay #Birds🪶 #Wildlife #WildlifePhotography #Ontario🇨🇦

That Guy, Martin 🇨🇦 (@tenebrisvacuum.bsky.social)2025-09-30T14:39:42.421Z

“But wait!” you might say. “Even if we concede this is a deal worth making, hasn’t Trump been ignoring Congressional appropriations from day one? Why would he obey a deal on Obamacare? Shouldn’t the bright line for Democrats at least be restoring Congress’s power of the purse?”

If you said that, you’d be right.

Project 2025 architect and Office of Management and Budget director Russell Vought and his DOGE army (installed by Elon Musk and still operating to this date) have been illegally firing federal employees, illegally shutting down entire federal agencies, illegally withholding federal funds, illegally redirecting funds to secret slush funds, illegally rescinding appropriations.

Billions in taxpayer dollars have become virtually untraceable,” Anna Kramer and Mark Alfred report. As David Dayen and Whitney Wimbish write, “the government is already shut down, and has been for several months.”

It’s been OMB director Russell Vought’s shutdown all along,” Daniel Schuman further explains. Now Vought is calling for illegal mass layoffs during the shutdown. “The shutdown provides another opportunity for action, even though agencies have no legal authority to layoff federal workers during one.”

Russ Vought’s shutdown plan is “illegal, unconstitutional, and deeply disturbing,” says Tim Whitehouse, the executive director of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility:

“The plan to exploit a shutdown to purge federal workers is illegal, unconstitutional, and deeply disturbing. A shutdown triggers furloughs, not firings. To weaponize it as a tool to destroy the civil service would mark a dangerous slide into lawlessness and further consolidate power in the Executive Branch.”

“Even without a government shutdown, a third of the US Geological Survey’s Climate Adaptation Science Centers could wind down or cease operations this week because the Interior Department is refusing to submit paperwork to release funding,” Jessica McKenzie writes.

“The list of projects and programs that the Trump administration has proposed terminating at NOAA is, frankly, shocking. It includes: the National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, which conducts wide-ranging research on everything from aquaculture to corals to pollution; the National Coastal Resilience Fund; Habitat Conservation and Restoration; and OAR’s Regional Climate Data and Information program, which helps communities develop plans for dealing with climate crises like droughts and heat waves.

The budget also recommends terminating funding for OAR’s Climate Laboratories and Cooperative Institutes, which would result in the closure of the Atlantic Oceanographic & Meteorological Laboratory; the Air Resources Laboratory; the Chemical Sciences Laboratory; the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory; the Global Monitoring Laboratory; the Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory; and the Physical Sciences Laboratory.”

Actually this particular sign is one you probably should obey in advance.

Adam Selzer (@adamchicago.bsky.social)2025-09-30T00:34:00.321Z

Fortunately, the stop-gap funding plan put forward by Senate Democrats includes several provisions to rein in Vought’s usurpation of Congress’s power of the purse, including reversing the recent $4.9 billion pocket rescission blessed by the radical Supreme Court. Dayen calls this the “No Kings budget.”

Two weeks ago on the Senate floor, minority leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) asked, “Why pass a budget if Russell Vought can unilaterally rescind it?

However and nevertheless: Since then, there’s been little effort made by the Democratic caucus—other than Sens. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) and Chris Murphy (D-Conn.)—to argue on behalf of the No Kings provisions, and key members of his caucus have said they’re willing to fold entirely in return for a pinky promise to deal with healthcare costs at some point later this year—in particular Shaheen and Schumer’s whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.).

Furthermore, there is limited organized pressure on Democrats to fight for the Constitution. 5calls.org is clear: “Oppose a Blank Check Federal Budget Deal.” The upstart Federal Unionists Network and 35 federal union locals are demanding Schumer and House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) defend the power of the purse.

However, the American Federation of Government Employees, which in March called for Democrats to hold the line against Trump, is now emphasizing a “stop the shutdown” message instead (with calls for a No Kings budget secondary). Indivisible is similarly making its push for a No Kings budget secondary to the healthcare message, even as it helps organize for No Kings protests on October 18. Even ResistBot is toeing the healthcare line.

Egret

Egret. Credit: Timothy Valentine

Most of the push against Democrats rubber-stamping the Trump regime’s dismantling of our 249-year-old constitutional democracy is coming from isolated bloggers like yours truly.1 One of them is Charles “ACA Signups” Gaba himself:

“If Trump is allowed to continue to ignore Congress and the Constitution whenever he feels like it, none of this will matter by the time the midterms come around anyway. Take a stand.”

Thanks for subscribing and spreading the word. If you’ve got job listings, event listings, or other hot news, I want to hear it. Connect with me—@[email protected], @climatebrad on Threads, and @climatebrad.hillheat.com on BlueSky.

Instead of giving a blank check to the Trump regime, why not help finance Hill Heat!

1  Fun fact, right before his heel turn as race-science apologist, Ezra Klein was one of those bloggers.

Reply

or to participate.