• Hill Heat
  • Posts
  • Chuck's Minority of the Opulent

Chuck's Minority of the Opulent

The faction of the Democratic Party that welcomed Schumer's collapse

Blackstone billionaire Stephen Schwarzman and Sen. Chuck Schumer at a 2016 gala. Credit: Zach Hilty

From its founding, the role of the U.S. Senate has been to protect the interests of the minority of the opulent from the desires of the democratic populace, and that remains true today.

As we discussed earlier, the Schumer Ten went against the will of almost every wing of the Democratic Party coalition in their vote for the Trump-Musk coup funding resolution. The outpouring of outrage led Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) to promptly cancel all scheduled in-person public appearances, particularly a multi-state book tour promoting his AIPAC-aligned verfallroman, Antisemitism in America. Schumer did continue his scheduled media tour, however, granting interviews to The View, All In With Chris Hayes, and CBS Mornings, where he played the court jester, cheerfully brushing off incredulity, anger, and scorn for his betrayal of his party.

But there was one key Democratic constituency who noticeably did not object to Schumer’s embrace of the Trump bill—those who James Madison called the “the opulent” (complimentary) and who are now known as Big Business. Nearly all of traditionally Democratic billionaires and corporate contributors have been conspicuously silent in public on the Trump-Musk coup, if not active cheerleaders or quivering lickspittles.1

With the caveat that campaign contributions provide a limited window into the mechanisms of political power and influence wielded by the corporate elite, let’s take a look at Schumer’s disclosed political funding sources.

The Billionaires

The greatest spigot of funds controlled by Schumer is the Senate Majority PAC (aka SMP), a super PAC nominally run by J.B. Poersch since 2017. SMP is funded primarily through direct contributions from billionaires and indirect contributions through its dark-money arm, Majority Forward.2 In the most recent cycle, about half of the donations came from wealthy individuals, and one-third were funneled through dark-money sources.

Here is an overview of the million-dollar-plus contributions from named inviduals to the Senate Majority PAC:

Name Contribution Jim Simons & family $17,525,000 Fred Eychaner $10,000,000 Jeff Skoll $7,000,000 Stephen Mandel $6,000,000 Deborah Simon & Cynthia Simon-Skjodt, sisters $5,250,000 Eric Schmidt $4,800,000 Reed Hastings $3,993,070 Henry & Marsha Laufer $3,600,000 J.B. Pritzker $3,500,000 George Marcus $3,000,000 Olan Mills II $2,765,970 David Lippe $2,355,800 John Fish $2,000,000 Martha Karsh $2,000,000 Vinod Khosla $2,000,000 Vin Ryan $2,000,000 Amos Hostetter, Jr. $1,750,000 Steven Spielberg $1,750,000 Amy Goldman-Fowler $1,500,000 James & Kathryn Murdoch $1,500,000 Terry Ragon $1,500,000 David Shaw $1,500,000 Jon Stryker $1,300,000 Allen Baum $1,250,000 Andrew Hauptman $1,250,000 Glen Tullman $1,200,000 Leonard Bell $1,150,000 Douglas & George Krupp, brothers $1,000,000 Jonathan Lavine $1,000,000 Carrie Penner $1,000,000 Stacy Schusterman $1,000,000 Paul & Jenna Segal $1,000,000 Aaron Sosnick $1,000,000 Robert & Amy Stavis $1,000,000 Donald Sussman $1,000,000 Individual donors to Senate Majority PAC, 2024 cycle

The billionaires backing Chuck Schumer’s Senate Majority PAC include the late Jim Simons, Fred Eychaner, Jeff Skoll, Stephen Mandel, Reed Hastings, Eric Schmidt, Gov. J.B. Pritzker (D-Ill.), George Marcus, and Vinod Khosla

Of Schumer’s top named billionaire backers, only Gov. J.B. Pritzker (D-Ill.) spoke out against the Trump-Musk coup bill.

In contrast, billionaire Jeffrey Skoll hosted a blow-out Trump inauguration party and hangs around on X to praise DOGE, Vinod Khosla reposted Musk’s attacks on the NIH, and Eric Schmidt is busying himself with Muskian investments in AI and space rockets. On the same day the House GOP passed the continuing resolution, Reed Hastings’s Netflix announced a three-show deal with the MAGA fascist comedian Tony “Floating Island of Garbage” Hinchcliffe.

Raul Fernandez, Donald Trump, Leo Castinedes, Jeff Skoll

Jeff Skoll (right), flipping to fund Donald Trump’s inaugural celebration.

Schumer’s personal campaign contributions over the course of several decades make clear his role as the senator of Wall Street and Big Law.

Contributor Total Individuals PACs Goldman Sachs $707,228 $654,228 $53,000 Paul, Weiss et al $689,868 $689,868 $0 Citigroup Inc $579,369 $526,553 $52,816 Blackstone Group $519,266 $496,266 $23,000 JPMorgan Chase & Co $419,574 $354,574 $65,000 Deloitte LLP $394,614 $336,615 $57,999 NextEra Energy $386,775 $369,275 $17,500 Morgan Stanley $383,451 $336,005 $47,446 Sullivan & Cromwell $376,765 $376,765 $0 KKR & Co $362,321 $346,321 $16,000 Lazard Ltd $361,450 $361,450 $0 Ernst & Young $348,580 $306,580 $42,000

Sen. Chuck Schumer’s silent majority—the employers of his personal top career donors.

Corporate leaders rely on their D.C. lobbyists most of the year, but the CEOs themselves sometimes make the personal trek to the nation’s capital. As the government funding deadline approached, they were in town, and had ample opportunity to oppose the autocratic shredding of the Constitution that the Republican continuing appropriations bill represented. (They did not.)

On March 11, the week of the continuing resolution’s passage, business titans met in several closed-door meetings in Washington, D.C. At the Yale CEO Caucus organized by Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, executives privately grumbled but made it clear they were not interested in publicly criticizing the regime:

Asked how much the stock market would need to decline for them to speak out collectively, 44% said it would have to fall 20%. Another 22% said stocks would have to fall 30% before they would take a stand. Plenty want to say nothing under any circumstances: Responding to the same survey question, nearly a quarter of CEOs said they didn’t see it as their role to publicly push back against the administration.

Then, they went over to the closed-door Business Roundtable meeting with Trump and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. After the meeting, Blackstone CEO Stephen Schwarzman publicly praised Trump’s tariff moves. JP Morgan Chase’s Jamie Dimon was more willing to be critical, saying “Uncertainty is not a good thing,” a move away from his earlier dismissal of concerns about Trump’s tariffs.

On March 12, the day before Schumer publicly folded, Goldman Sachs CEO David “DJ D-Sol” Solomon went on Fox Business to tell Maria Bartiromo he was a fan of Trump:

“One of the things that I do like is that the president is engaged with the business community. That’s a different experience than what we’ve had for the past four years. . . CEOs are excited about the tailwinds like the move to lower regulation.”

Citigroup CEO Jane Fraser had announced a month earlier the company was abandoning equity goals under pressure from Trump.

Following Schumer’s collapse on Friday, Trump took aim at Chuck’s brother’s law firm Paul, Weiss, which quickly folded as well.

So Schumer’s utter lack of a plan to stop the Trump-Musk takeover is not as inexplicable as it appears at first blush.

It won’t solve all the problems of the Senate Democrats for Schumer to pass the torch, but it’s a start.

Hill Heat’s U.S. Climate Politics Almanac is made available to the public thanks to our paid subscribers. Join their ranks today and grow the movement:

1  Herein I make the obligatory reminder that the Republican Party is wholly dominated by billionaire interests, whereas the opulent minority is, by contrast, a powerful faction within the Democratic Party.

2  Five percent of the 2024 cycle contributions came from unions.

Reply

or to participate.